Showing posts with label municipalities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label municipalities. Show all posts

Monday, April 27, 2020

Civil Equality Privatization, Federalization, Nationalization Policing



[Science-Fictional-Fiction]: 03d-03m-2020y@17:35 / 2101
Naked clarity, the “benefits”, privatization of all law-enforcement is not, never-will-be and evenly historical fact services ruling class of small towns to largest U.S. cities, and the end-game it solidifies into a single private-military entity force.

Currently, the U.S. Government transfers ownership of all family precious metals, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Reserve_Act). , into U.S. government-owned property as did in WWII and will be again, beware.

Note that Chinese SOE and other SOE are the same globally and is the acronym for "State Owned Enterprise", remember this.

A state-owned enterprise (SOE) is a legal entity that is created by a government in order to partake in commercial activities on the government's behalf. It can be either wholly or partially owned by a government and is typically earmarked to participate in specific commercial activities. i.e. Commercial/Private-Contractor(s).

The private-military-contractors "Department of Defense" hires private-policing contractors as law-enforcement in civilian communities throughout U.S.A. and abroad as under-cover agent(s) informant(s) from within the core of every police department unknown to them a betrayal of their own nepotism circles of enforcement strength.

This end-result will be known as, "privatization", "federalization", and-or "nationalization" of all or any policing-force(s) economics into small -to- large civilian sectors.

Local to state law-enforcement Internal affairs are monitored via cellphone towers, shortwave radio, internet, i2p mobile communication and more of all lower law-enforcement activities and transactions; Be advised, meaning you, watch six, because there's zero privacy for all law-enforcement in the United States when PMC's are next in line to take control -i.e. Katrina disaster via blackwater/PMC intervention.

For those interested in related economic topic, see also another short post by the same author from last September, debunking other arguments to promote the privatization fairy, Revisiting Privatization’s Claims -i.e. economics.

By Jomo Kwame Sundaram, former UN Assistant Secretary General for Economic Development. Originally published at Inter Press Service

U.S.DOD translated the Privatization of U.S. law-enforcement into the legitimate need for civilian protection from criminal mafia-nepotism regards municipality/state/federal policing end-all targeted by DOD, and the news-medias and funded by non-profit enforcing the over-throw of all local-to-federal law-enforcement dissolved into PMC's.

This works, a well-lubricated game-theory power grab of large PAC-man-nepotism eating the smaller PAC-man-nepotism, and sadly said is happening as you read this.

Since any SOEs are private/state/DOD monopolies will and shall be the first move by private-military-contractors, (behind-closed-doors), this privatization has typically transformed SOE into puppets of private-contractor monopolies hiding within SOE. 

End game-theory reflects Gorge Orwellian Theorem nightmare a silent declared war as information warfare cannon folder awaits a nationwide event to ignite the soft-war.

Privatization will worsen fiscal loss in revenue by privatized SOEs in the end-game-theory as does China.

Privatization Burdens All in The "End_Game-Theory":
Privatization burdens the public when charges or fees are not reduced, or when the services provided are significantly reduced creating an indentured society.

Privatization often burdens the public in different ways as marketing power is exercised weakened, abused by, absorbing small-medium-large communities into the privatization, As private military security forces owning everything and policing all of North-America already is full-actual like a lizard's motion in the grass unnoticed.

This manifestation does not provide public safety to all, the non-wealthy are excluded, they are not considered commercially viable, nor as an economic value for the corporate greater-good. This is the standard of economic self-interest. The wealthy will be left alone living as Queens and Kings throughout the world and the rest of earth populations as dying peasants sifting through dumpsters for food and clothing. 

Consequently, privatization worsens overall enterprise performance public health sustainability when nepotism manifests, whereby, 1wk -to- 1yr duty stations are established destroying small town to large city nepotism power-holds.
The "Value for money" for the middle and lower class solvent into poverty is pre-planned to go down despite ostensible improvements used to justify higher user-friendly charges and earnings over-taxed serving corporations.

This leaves the rest of the public sector even less profitable to protect and serve and thus considered obsolete inefficient, in turn justifying further privatizations -i.e. Federalization, Nationalization of Policing.

This is sold "as-is" remains as one of the future focal points enforcing the law and the affordable-living, (Universal Basic Income/UBI), labor is mandatory, and all case-workers, maids, and all asserting everyone goes to work. -i.e. a lower class.

The Performance Of State-Owned Enterprises Has Been Shockingly Bad

Elusiveness:
Privatization is needed by the government inherently considered, as-is, efficient and does know how to run enterprises exceptionally well, because nearly one and the same in the end-all schism is nationalization, federalization, and security privatization to ensure equal freedom for all.

Inforsec: 777
The government will subsidize privatized SOEs, assumed more efficient, in order to fulfill its obligations to the U.S. citizenry increasingly downtrodden by these methods.

Such obligations may not involve direct payments or transfers, but rather, lucrative concessions to the privatized SOE.

Thus, they may well make far more from these additional concessions than the actual cost of fulfilling government and citizen political obligations.

Privatization of profitable enterprises or segments perpetuates the exclusion of the deserving citizen but also worsens overall public sector performance now encumbered remaining unprofitable by obligations via the larger PAC-man effect dissolves into a poverty labor force globally.

One consequence is public sector performance which is reduced and controlled by federalization/Private-Military-Contractor Policing and end-all forced labor to level cost-effectiveness.

This policing will be contributing to what appears to be a self-fulfilling prophecy by RAND.org level think-tank perspective mentality, otherwise viewed as socialist insanity of royalty -vs- peasants.

To make matters worse, the public sector is then stuck with financing the unprofitable, thus seemingly supporting the privatization prophecy end-all game-theory grows effective.

No Benefits:
Privatization typically enriches the politically connected wealthy few in small towns, cities, and eventually Government(s) and then nations; preplanned.

PMC-Policing is a real-life trojan horse, a dirty conception, and involved secure lucrative ownership by sacrificing the national or public interest for private profit, even when privatization may not seem to benefit them in the absolute least, but authoritative self-empowerment resolves this dilemma.

Privatization in developing and transition economies has primarily enriched the genetic wealthy royalty global class always and sacrificed private business interests transform country-side into impoverished landscapes touching from horizon to horizon.

This enacted exacerbated corruption, patronage, and other related problems that may lead to impoverished starvation tolls that reach into the billions.

Following Russian voucher privatization and other Western recommended reforms, for which there was a limited domestic constituency then, within three years (1992-1994), the Russian economy had collapsed by half, and adult male life expectancy fell.

It was the greatest such recorded catastrophe in the last six millennia of recorded human history, and let that sink-in into your mind in an indefinite loop.

The Global Military Industrial Complex and with International Intelligence Communities liked how this worked out, and now are using this as a global standard ushering in a new-age of policing establishing a corporate-congress of single governance.

Soon after, a couple of dozen young Russian oligarchs taken over the commanding remains of the Russian economy, (Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is the President of Russia since 2012 is one to mention), and as many monetized their gains and invested abroad, leaving the country and some returned as the others migrating to follow their new wealth abroad, and what now remains is now Vladimir Putin's Russia.

Lets celebrated the Western media as an economic progress enforcer of their ideas, and by those abroad who will never have our best national interests; shall we?

Saturday, June 15, 2019

H.R. 645 (111th): National Emergency Centers Establishment Act


111th CONGRESS
1st Session


H. R. 645

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 22, 2009
Mr. Hastings of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
123

123

A BILL
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. Short title.
This Act may be cited as the “National Emergency Centers Establishment Act”.
SEC. 2. Establishment of national emergency centers.

(a) In general.—In accordance with the requirements of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish not fewer than 6 national emergency centers on military installations.

(b) Purpose of national emergency centers.—The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure—
(1) to provide temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster;

(2) to provide centralized locations for the purposes of training and ensuring the coordination of Federal, State, and local first responders;

(3) to provide centralized locations to improve the coordination of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts of government, private, and not-for-profit entities and faith-based organizations; and

(4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
SEC. 3. Designation of military installations as national emergency centers.

(a) In general.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall designate not fewer than 6 military installations as sites for the establishment of national emergency centers.

(b) Minimum requirements.—A site designated as a national emergency center shall be—
(1) capable of meeting for an extended period of time the housing, health, transportation, education, public works, humanitarian and other transition needs of a large number of individuals affected by an emergency or major disaster;

(2) environmentally safe and shall not pose a health risk to individuals who may use the center;

(3) capable of being scaled up or down to accommodate major disaster preparedness and response drills, operations, and procedures;

(4) capable of housing existing permanent structures necessary to meet training and first responders coordination requirements during nondisaster periods;

(5) capable of hosting the infrastructure necessary to rapidly adjust to temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance needs;

(6) required to consist of a complete operations command center, including 2 state-of-the art command and control centers that will comprise a 24/7 operations watch center as follows:
(A) one of the command and control centers shall be in full ready mode; and

(B) the other shall be used daily for training; and

(7) easily accessible at all times and be able to facilitate handicapped and medical facilities, including during an emergency or major disaster.

(c) Location of national emergency centers.—There shall be established not fewer than one national emergency center in each of the following areas:
(1) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions I, II, and III.

(2) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IV.

(3) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions V and VII.

(4) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VI.

(5) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions VIII and X.

(6) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IX.

(d) Preference for designation of closed military installations.—Wherever possible, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall designate a closed military installation as a site for a national emergency center. If the Secretaries of Homeland Security and Defense jointly determine that there is not a sufficient number of closed military installations that meet the requirements of subsections (b) and (c), the Secretaries shall jointly designate portions of existing military installations other than closed military installations as national emergency centers.

(e) Transfer of control of closed military installations.—If a closed military installation is designated as a national emergency center, not later than 180 days after the date of designation, the Secretary of Defense shall transfer to the Secretary of Homeland Security administrative jurisdiction over such closed military installation.

(f) Cooperative agreement for joint use of existing military installations.—If an existing military installation other than a closed military installation is designated as a national emergency center, not later than 180 days after the date of designation, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a cooperative agreement to provide for the establishment of the national emergency center.

(g) Reports.—
(1) PRELIMINARY REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site—
(A) an outline of the reasons why the site was selected;

(B) an outline of the need to construct, repair, or update any existing infrastructure at the site;

(C) an outline of the need to conduct any necessary environmental clean-up at the site;

(D) an outline of preliminary plans for the transfer of control of the site from the Secretary of Defense to the Secretary of Homeland Security, if necessary under subsection (e); and

(E) an outline of preliminary plans for entering into a cooperative agreement for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection (f).

(2) UPDATE REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site—
(A) an update on the information contained in the report as required by paragraph (1);

(B) an outline of the progress made toward the transfer of control of the site, if necessary under subsection (e);

(C) an outline of the progress made toward entering a cooperative agreement for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection (f); and

(D) recommendations regarding any authorizations and appropriations that may be necessary to provide for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site.

(3) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site—
(A) finalized information detailing the transfer of control of the site, if necessary under subsection (e);

(B) the finalized cooperative agreement for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection (f); and

(C) any additional information pertinent to the establishment of a national emergency center at the site.

(4) ADDITIONAL REPORTS.—The Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, may submit to Congress additional reports as necessary to provide updates on steps being taken to meet the requirements of this Act.
SEC. 4. Limitations on statutory construction.
This Act does not affect—

(1) the authority of the Federal Government to provide emergency or major disaster assistance or to implement any disaster mitigation and response program, including any program authorized by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.); or

(2) the authority of a State or local government to respond to an emergency.
SEC. 5. Authorization of appropriations.
There is authorized to be appropriated $180,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010 to carry out this Act. Such funds shall remain available until expended.
SEC. 6. Definitions.
In this Act, the following definitions apply:

(1) CLOSED MILITARY INSTALLATION.—The term “closed military installation” means a military installation, or portion thereof, approved for closure or realignment under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) that meet all, or 2 out of the 3 following requirements:
(A) Is located in close proximity to a transportation corridor.

(B) Is located in a State with a high level or threat of disaster related activities.

(C) Is located near a major metropolitan center.

(2) EMERGENCY.—The term “emergency” has the meaning given such term in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122).

(3) MAJOR DISASTER.—The term “major disaster” has the meaning given such term in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122).

(4) MILITARY INSTALLATION.—The term “military installation” has the meaning given such term in section 2910 of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note).

FBIS Blog Visits

Blog Archive

Popular Posts